What Kind Of Animals Lived 600k Years Ago

Homo bodoensis, a new species of human ancestor, lived in Africa during the Middle Pleistocene. — Artist's rendition of Homo bodoensis, a new species of human antecedent that lived in Africa

Ettore Mazza

A new species of extinct man has been named: Homo bodoensis. The species hasn't been identified based on new fossils, but on re-examination of quondam ones. Why do researchers recollect there is some other species of human? Here's what yous need to know.

Who was Human bodoensis?

Homo bodoensis is the proposed name for fossils of a grouping of hominins that lived in Africa during a menstruum ordinarily known as the Middle Pleistocene, but now technically called the Chibanian, between 770,000 and 126,000 years ago. The species has been described past Mirjana Roksandic at the University of Winnipeg in Canada and her colleagues. It is named for the Bodo cranium, which was found in 1976 at Bodo D'ar in the Brimful river valley of Federal democratic republic of ethiopia. The cranium is most 600,000 years erstwhile.

Advertising

The researchers argue that H. bodoensis lived widely throughout Africa for hundreds of thousands of years. They suggest that other specimens of this species include Kabwe i from Zambia, the Ndutu and Ngaloba skulls from Tanzania and the Saldanha cranium from Elandsfontein in South Africa. H. bodoensis may also accept wandered into the eastern Mediterranean, they say.

What were all these fossils classified as before?

They were given diverse species designations, which were often used in contradictory means. For example, depending on which studies you read, the Bodo attic is variously called Homo heidelbergensis or Homo rhodesiensis. Both species are hard to pivot down.

H. heidelbergensis is named for a 609,000-twelvemonth-old jawbone establish in Mauer, Germany. A number of similar bones are known from Europe and Africa during the Center Pleistocene. But researchers differ on whether they are all H. heidelbergensis.

Meanwhile, H. rhodesiensis was start named to describe the Kabwe one skull. This bone was found in 1921 in what is now Zambia, but was so called Northern Rhodesia. At the time the area was controlled by the British Empire. The proper name Rhodesia originates with Cecil Rhodes, a British mining magnate and politician. Partly considering of this clan, Roksandic says, the name is rarely used.

What other hominins lived during the Middle Pleistocene?

In a give-and-take, lots. In Europe, the Neanderthals emerged during this period, while farther e in Asia their sister group the Denisovans also evolved. In southern Africa there was Homo naledi. Finally, modernistic humans (Man sapiens) emerged in Africa effectually 300,000 years ago – about halfway through the Middle Pleistocene.

This tangle of species has been dubbed "the muddle in the Middle Pleistocene". The problem is sorting out which fossils belong to which species and thus how widespread and long-lived each species was. There is also the issue of figuring out which species gave ascension to which.

For case, it used to be idea that H. heidelbergensis was the antecedent of Neanderthals. Notwithstanding, this cannot be true considering genetics tells us that Neanderthals emerged early in the Center Pleistocene, mayhap fifty-fifty before the time of the oldest H. heidelbergensis fossils. There were Neanderthals living in northern Spain 430,000 years ago. In the past five years, many European specimens previously described as H. heidelbergensis have been reclassified every bit early on Neanderthals.

Read more: 'Dragon man' claimed equally new species of ancient human but doubts remain

Where does H. bodoensis fit into all of this?

Roksandic and her colleagues want to make sense of the muddle. They argue that all the African fossils previously chosen H. heidelbergensis or H. rhodesiensis should be thought of equally one species, H. bodoensis. This species, they argue, eventually gave rise to ours.

Meanwhile, they say H. heidelbergensis fossils found in Europe can all be reclassified as early Neanderthals, and that fossils from the eastern Mediterranean that don't quite fit whatsoever of the species could stand for interbreeding.

The team chose H. bodoensis so that these African hominins would "finally" have an African name, says Roksandic.

Does everyone concord we need a new species proper noun?

It's not necessary, says Chris Stringer at the Natural History Museum in London.

Stringer does agree that H. heidelbergensis has been used too loosely. "I'm partly to blame for this broad usage of heidelbergensis," he says apologetically. He thinks it should at present be confined to the original Mauer jawbone and another European fossils, such equally the BH-one jawbone from Mala Balanica cavern in Serbia.

Equally for the African remains, Stringer is happy to use H. rhodesiensis. He argues it was named for the state in which it was found, non for Cecil Rhodes himself, and therefore doesn't honour him. Furthermore, the rules set out by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature land that established names take priority – then because H. rhodesiensis has already been formally named, information technology should be used unless the original description was wrong.

Alternatively, if H. rhodesiensis is deemed unsuitable because of its imperial connotations, Stringer says there are pre-existing alternatives. For case, the Saldanha cranium – one of the specimens Roksandic'due south squad placed in H. bodoensis – was dubbed Human saldanensis by Matthew Drennan in the 1950s. "Even if you got rid of rhodesiensis, there are other names that would apply rather than creating a new one," says Stringer.

Stringer is besides sceptical of the merits that the Bodo attic is our direct ancestor. In 2019, his team published a study of the evolution of the homo face, which constitute that the species the Bodo cranium belonged to had gone downward a different evolutionary path to our species.

Journal reference: Evolutionary Anthropology, DOI: ten.1002/EVAN.21929

Sign up to Our Human Story, a complimentary monthly newsletter on the revolution in archaeology and human being development